Keyword summary
⁠35%1 analyzed article/video943 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Miriam Sim results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Loss Aversion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 186 hits. Analysis detected 1,710 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,772 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (40,694 of 53,827 keywords). This Miriam Sim is better (less manipulative) than 75.60% of the peer group.
Miriam Sim
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠25%Miriam Sim (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,772
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

24% percentile
025507510024.4% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.5%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos