Keyword summary
1%1 analyzed article/video463 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michigan State University Center For Regional Food Systems results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Indoctrination, and Unattributed Quote, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 1.8% saturation with 25 hits. Analysis detected 69 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,389 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (31,934 of 32,814 keywords). This Michigan State University Center For Regional Food Systems is better (less manipulative) than 97.30% of the peer group.
Michigan State University Center For Regional Food Systems
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 1,389
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Michigan State University Center For Regional Food Systems attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Michigan State University Center For Regional Food Systems vs sitewide
Michigan State University Center For Regional Food Systems attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos