Keyword summary
33% 1 analyzed article/video 602 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Rush results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 287 hits . Analysis detected 1,368 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,408 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 57% (22,473 of 51,433 keywords). This Michael Rush is worse (more manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group. Michael Rush
Keyword details
Total words: 2,408
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.3% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst