Keyword summary
63% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,502 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Massive Attack results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 652 hits . Analysis detected 5,391 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,008 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 54% (27,884 of 59,653 keywords). This Massive Attack is worse (more manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group. Massive Attack
Keyword details
Total words: 6,008
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.3% percentile 2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst