Keyword summary
80%1 analyzed article/video662 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Martha Castex Tatum results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, In-Group Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 122 hits. Analysis detected 1,554 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,986 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 53% (15,058 of 31,609 keywords). This Martha Castex Tatum is worse (more manipulative) than 52.40% of the peer group.
Martha Castex Tatum
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Martha Castex Tatum attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Martha Castex Tatum vs sitewide
Martha Castex Tatum attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.