Author summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video662 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jarrod Wardwell results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, In-Group Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 122 hits. Analysis detected 1,554 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,986 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (2,309 of 5,694 authors). This Jarrod Wardwell is worse (more manipulative) than 59.50% of the peer group.
Jarrod Wardwell
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠1%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠60%Jarrod Wardwell (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,986
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Jarrod Wardwell attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Jarrod Wardwell vs sitewide
Jarrod Wardwell attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos