Keyword summary
⁠20%4 analyzed articles/videos4,786 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Library Of Congress results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 1,600 hits. Analysis detected 11,922 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,436 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠10% (28,026 of 31,093 keywords). This Library Of Congress is better (less manipulative) than 90.10% of the peer group.
Library Of Congress
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Borders1%
⁠0%French Revolution1%
⁠10%Library Of Congress (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 16,436
Article count: 4
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Library Of Congress attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Library Of Congress vs sitewide
Library Of Congress attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos