Author summary
⁠65%1 analyzed article/video598 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Melina Khan USA Today results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 139 hits. Analysis detected 1,309 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,794 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (1,971 of 5,621 authors). This Melina Khan USA Today is worse (more manipulative) than 64.90% of the peer group.
Melina Khan USA Today
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠1%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠65%Melina Khan USA Today (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,794
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Melina Khan USA Today attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Melina Khan USA Today vs sitewide
Melina Khan USA Today attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos