Keyword summary
⁠27%1 analyzed article/video1,340 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lawsuit Texas Tech Teaching Directives Dei results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 389 hits. Analysis detected 2,158 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,020 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (20,406 of 33,051 keywords). This Lawsuit Texas Tech Teaching Directives Dei is better (less manipulative) than 61.70% of the peer group.
Lawsuit Texas Tech Teaching Directives Dei
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Borders1%
⁠0%French Revolution1%
⁠39%Lawsuit Texas Tech Teaching Directives Dei (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,020
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Lawsuit Texas Tech Teaching Directives Dei attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Lawsuit Texas Tech Teaching Directives Dei vs sitewide
Lawsuit Texas Tech Teaching Directives Dei attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos