Author summary
⁠32%1 analyzed article/video1,340 analyzed words
BS Summary: These DANIEL PEREZ/El Paso Matters results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 389 hits. Analysis detected 2,158 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,020 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (3,327 of 6,001 authors). This DANIEL PEREZ/El Paso Matters is better (less manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group.
DANIEL PEREZ/El Paso Matters
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠1%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠45%DANIEL PEREZ/El Paso Matters (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,020
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
DANIEL PEREZ/El Paso Matters attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
DANIEL PEREZ/El Paso Matters vs sitewide
DANIEL PEREZ/El Paso Matters attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos