Keyword summary
70%1 analyzed article/video1,521 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julia Luderwaldt results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Anecdotal, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 955 hits. Analysis detected 5,846 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,084 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 53% (24,710 of 51,675 keywords). This Julia Luderwaldt is worse (more manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group.
Julia Luderwaldt
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
53%Julia Luderwaldt (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,084
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

52% percentile
025507510052.2% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 15.7%15.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 10.2%10.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%No True Scotsman: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos