Keyword summary
⁠28%1 analyzed article/video1,052 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Judge William Hayes results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 215 hits. Analysis detected 1,592 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,208 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (46,885 of 56,278 keywords). This Judge William Hayes is better (less manipulative) than 83.30% of the peer group.
Judge William Hayes
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠17%Judge William Hayes (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,208
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

17% percentile
025507510016.7% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Red Herring: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos