Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video737 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Sterling results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 493 hits. Analysis detected 2,059 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,948 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 46% (15,717 of 28,615 keywords). This John Sterling is better (less manipulative) than 54.90% of the peer group.
John Sterling
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
John Sterling attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
John Sterling vs sitewide
John Sterling attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.