Keyword summary
3%1 analyzed article/video978 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joe Pulliam results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Anchoring Bias, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 2.8% saturation with 83 hits. Analysis detected 593 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,934 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 1% (37,302 of 37,536 keywords). This Joe Pulliam is better (less manipulative) than 99.40% of the peer group.
Joe Pulliam
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Joe Pulliam attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Joe Pulliam vs sitewide
Joe Pulliam attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.