Keyword summary
49%1 analyzed article/video516 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Israel Hamas Deal results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Slippery Slope, Appeal to Emotion, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 259 hits. Analysis detected 1,441 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,064 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 58% (25,155 of 59,653 keywords). This Israel Hamas Deal is worse (more manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group.
Israel Hamas Deal
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
58%Israel Hamas Deal (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,064
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

58% percentile
025507510057.8% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 11.1%11.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.6%12.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Slippery Slope: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Middle Ground: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.1%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos