Keyword summary
9% 1 analyzed article/video 382 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Isabel results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 3.5% saturation with 53 hits . Analysis detected 476 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,528 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 21% (45,544 of 57,592 keywords). This Isabel is better (less manipulative) than 79.10% of the peer group. Isabel
Keyword details
Total words: 1,528
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.9% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% No True Scotsman: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst