Keyword summary
ā 51%1 analyzed article/video1,125 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iraq Iran China Balancing Act results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 447 hits. Analysis detected 1,999 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,500 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ā 36% (31,905 of 49,524 keywords). This Iraq Iran China Balancing Act is better (less manipulative) than 64.40% of the peer group.
Iraq Iran China Balancing Act
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Iraq Iran China Balancing Act attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Iraq Iran China Balancing Act vs sitewide
Iraq Iran China Balancing Act attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.