Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video897 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran Nuclear Talks results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Ad Hominem, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 216 hits. Analysis detected 2,155 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,588 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 25% (21,606 of 28,615 keywords). This Iran Nuclear Talks is better (less manipulative) than 75.50% of the peer group.
Iran Nuclear Talks
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Iran Nuclear Talks attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Iran Nuclear Talks vs sitewide
Iran Nuclear Talks attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.