Keyword summary
⁠73%2 analyzed articles/videos1,906 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Innovation Law Lab results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 552 hits. Analysis detected 3,974 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,718 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (24,053 of 51,173 keywords). This Innovation Law Lab is worse (more manipulative) than 53.00% of the peer group.
Innovation Law Lab
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠53%Innovation Law Lab (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,718
Article count: 2
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Innovation Law Lab attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Innovation Law Lab vs sitewide
Innovation Law Lab attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos