Keyword summary
53%2 analyzed articles/videos1,890 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Illinois Department Of Healthcare And Family Services results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 1,082 hits. Analysis detected 3,946 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,560 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 12% (52,475 of 59,653 keywords). This Illinois Department Of Healthcare And Family Services is better (less manipulative) than 88.00% of the peer group.
Illinois Department Of Healthcare And Family Services
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 7,560
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

12% percentile
025507510012.0% percentile
1.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.3%14.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos