Keyword summary
77%1 analyzed article/video1,477 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hydrogen Fuels results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 1,011 hits. Analysis detected 6,587 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,908 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 65% (17,620 of 49,712 keywords). This Hydrogen Fuels is worse (more manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group.
Hydrogen Fuels
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Hydrogen Fuels attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Hydrogen Fuels vs sitewide
Hydrogen Fuels attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.