Keyword summary
ā 72%1 analyzed article/video1,207 analyzed words
BS Summary: These House Appropriations Committee results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 372 hits. Analysis detected 3,353 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,621 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ā 48% (17,785 of 33,961 keywords). This House Appropriations Committee is better (less manipulative) than 52.40% of the peer group.
House Appropriations Committee
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
ā 0%Bastille Day1%
ā 0%Radio Broadcasts1%
ā 0%Metropolitan Opera1%
ā 0%Self-Driving Cars1%
ā 0%Self Driving Cars1%
ā 48%House Appropriations Committee (selected)3%
ā 100%Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%Mike Lewis60%
ā 100%Joni Balter60%
ā 100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,621
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
House Appropriations Committee attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
House Appropriations Committee vs sitewide
House Appropriations Committee attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos