Keyword summary
1%1 analyzed article/video463 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hamtramck Parks Conservancy results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Indoctrination, and Unattributed Quote, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 1.8% saturation with 25 hits. Analysis detected 69 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,389 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (31,930 of 32,814 keywords). This Hamtramck Parks Conservancy is better (less manipulative) than 97.30% of the peer group.
Hamtramck Parks Conservancy
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Hamtramck Parks Conservancy attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Hamtramck Parks Conservancy vs sitewide
Hamtramck Parks Conservancy attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.