Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video596 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Habitat For Humanity results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Slippery Slope, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 324 hits. Analysis detected 1,265 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,384 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 56% (16,565 of 37,536 keywords). This Habitat For Humanity is worse (more manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group.
Habitat For Humanity
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Habitat For Humanity attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Habitat For Humanity vs sitewide
Habitat For Humanity attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.