Keyword summary
73% 1 analyzed article/video 831 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Greta Lee results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.4% saturation with 1,012 hits . Analysis detected 3,339 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,324 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 81% (11,478 of 59,653 keywords). This Greta Lee is worse (more manipulative) than 80.80% of the peer group. Greta Lee
Keyword details
Total words: 3,324
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.8% percentile 4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 30.4% 30.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 14.3% 14.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 30.4%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.5% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.6% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.1% Straw Man: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.9% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.9% Red Herring: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst