Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video581 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Great Green Wall China results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 4.6% saturation with 106 hits. Analysis detected 1,096 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,324 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (28,830 of 37,536 keywords). This Great Green Wall China is better (less manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group.
Great Green Wall China
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Great Green Wall China attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Great Green Wall China vs sitewide
Great Green Wall China attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.