Keyword summary
1%1 analyzed article/video463 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Good Food For Michigan Project results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Indoctrination, and Unattributed Quote, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 1.8% saturation with 25 hits. Analysis detected 69 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,389 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (31,929 of 32,814 keywords). This Good Food For Michigan Project is better (less manipulative) than 97.30% of the peer group.
Good Food For Michigan Project
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Good Food For Michigan Project attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Good Food For Michigan Project vs sitewide
Good Food For Michigan Project attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.