Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video3,162 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food Science results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 2,077 hits. Analysis detected 12,420 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,648 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (15,911 of 28,615 keywords). This Food Science is better (less manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group.
Food Science
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠45%Food Science (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 12,648
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Food Science attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Food Science vs sitewide
Food Science attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos