Keyword summary
93% 1 analyzed article/video 830 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Feeding Louisiana results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 419 hits . Analysis detected 3,853 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,320 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 78% (13,209 of 59,653 keywords). This Feeding Louisiana is worse (more manipulative) than 77.90% of the peer group. Feeding Louisiana
Keyword details
Total words: 3,320
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
78% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 77.9% percentile 3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.3% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.4% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst