Keyword summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video1,218 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Science Funding results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Slippery Slope, and Negativity Bias, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 642 hits. Analysis detected 6,175 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,654 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (7,546 of 37,536 keywords). This Federal Science Funding is worse (more manipulative) than 79.90% of the peer group.
Federal Science Funding
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠80%Federal Science Funding (selected)5%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,654
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Federal Science Funding attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Federal Science Funding vs sitewide
Federal Science Funding attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos