Keyword summary
91%1 analyzed article/video575 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Fire results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 394 hits. Analysis detected 2,367 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,300 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 79% (10,921 of 51,380 keywords). This Federal Fire is worse (more manipulative) than 78.70% of the peer group.
Federal Fire
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
79%Federal Fire (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,300
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

79% percentile
025507510078.7% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.9%14.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 17.1%17.1%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 12.3%12.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos