Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Federal Energy Regulatory Commission results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Negativity Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 222 hits. Analysis detected 945 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,820 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 1,820
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission vs sitewide
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos