Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Federal Energy Regulatory Commission results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Negativity Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 222 hits. Analysis detected 945 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,820 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission vs sitewide
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.