KUER0%

Energy company again asks feds to permit a hydropower project on the Navajo Nation 22%

By Chris Clements0% KNAU0%

6/5/2026, 2:19:23 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Recency Bias as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 500 faulty-reasoning hits from 455 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 35.7% and a BS Rank of 22% (17,105 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 78.20% of the article peer group.

Once again, an energy company with ties to France is asking a federal agency to allow exploration of a possible hydropower project on the Navajo Nation. 
Nature and People First applied for a preliminary permit from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) last year to investigate the possibility of building a pumped storage project 12 miles southwest of Kayenta. 
On May 27, FERC accepted the application for filing, opening up a public comment period that allows protests of the proposed project and motions to intervene in the company's request for a permit. 
The Chilchinbeto Pumped Storage Project would include two reservoirs, each with a storage capacity of 10,000 acre-feet of water. 
Pumped water storage projects generate energy by letting water flow downhill from high-elevation reservoirs through a tunnel, turning a turbine as it travels to reservoirs at lower elevations. 
Then, when energy prices are low, water is pumped back uphill. 
On its application for preliminary permits, the company said it would get water for the project from either the Coconino aquifer or the San Juan River. 
Nature and People First tried to get FERC approval for three pumped storage projects in 2021, but the Navajo Nation opposed the idea and the feds later denied the company's request for permits. 
In its Biden-era decision to deny those permits, FERC said it was establishing a new policy about working more closely with Native American tribes. 
"The Commission will not issue preliminary permits for projects proposing to use Tribal lands if the Tribe on whose lands the project is to be located opposes the permit," the agency wrote in 2024. 
On Dec. 
10, 2025, U.S. 
Department of Energy Secretary Chris Wright asked FERC to overturn that policy, calling it a part of "unnecessary burdens" to hydropower development. 
Critics have raised concerns about past proposed hydropower projects from Nature and People First. 
They've cited the potential for the overuse of aquifers and damage to the environment of nearby Black Mesa. 
"This time around, we definitely have our hands full," says Adrian Herder with the Navajo nonprofit  Nizhóní Ání, which works to protect water sources in the region. 
"[It raises] the question of, where does that Biden era tribal consultation and consent  does it still hold on this issue, or has that already been terminated with this new administration?" 
Meanwhile, proponents of past projects, including chapter officials in Chilchinbeto, have highlighted the need for pumped storage solutions to help with the intermittency of renewable energies, as well as their economic benefits. 
The area near the proposed project has ecological and cultural significance to both the Navajo and Hopi tribes. 
Copyright 2026 KNAU News Talk 
Confirmation Bias
7%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
3.1%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
7.3%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
14.1%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
7%
Pessimism Bias
4.8%
Negativity Bias
11.2%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
10.1%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
15.8%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
7.5%
False Dilemma
7%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
4.8%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
3.1%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
7%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

455 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.