Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video447 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Exxonmobil results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Framing Effect, and Recency Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 271 hits. Analysis detected 1,990 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,788 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (10,321 of 28,615 keywords). This Exxonmobil is worse (more manipulative) than 63.90% of the peer group.
Exxonmobil
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠64%Exxonmobil (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,788
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Exxonmobil attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Exxonmobil vs sitewide
Exxonmobil attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos