Keyword summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video2,387 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Exxon Mobil results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, In-Group Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 28% saturation with 2,003 hits. Analysis detected 8,417 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,161 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (11,837 of 33,961 keywords). This Exxon Mobil is worse (more manipulative) than 65.10% of the peer group.
Exxon Mobil
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Radio Broadcasts1%
⁠0%Metropolitan Opera1%
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠66%Exxon Mobil (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,161
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Exxon Mobil attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Exxon Mobil vs sitewide
Exxon Mobil attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos