Keyword summary
34% 1 analyzed article/video 1,056 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Environmental Marketing results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Slippery Slope , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.5% saturation with 232 hits . Analysis detected 2,100 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,224 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 18% (44,258 of 54,002 keywords). This Environmental Marketing is better (less manipulative) than 82.00% of the peer group. Environmental Marketing
Keyword details
Total words: 4,224
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.0% percentile 1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Straw Man: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst