Keyword summary
⁠88%1 analyzed article/video828 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Environmental Genocide results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Authority, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 24.9% saturation with 826 hits. Analysis detected 3,928 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,312 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (7,669 of 51,867 keywords). This Environmental Genocide is worse (more manipulative) than 85.20% of the peer group.
Environmental Genocide
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠86%Environmental Genocide (selected)5%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,312
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

85% percentile
025507510085.2% percentile
4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.0%5.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 24.9%24.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.0%13.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 12.7%12.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 24.9%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos