Keyword summary
94%1 analyzed article/video130 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Energy Risks results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 489 faulty-reasoning hits from 390 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of 84% (6,304 of 37,530 keywords). This Energy Risks is worse (more manipulative) than 83.20% of the peer group.
Energy Risks
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Energy Risks attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Energy Risks vs sitewide
Energy Risks attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.