Keyword summary
⁠58%1 analyzed article/video1,082 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emissions Trading System results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Slippery Slope, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 333 hits. Analysis detected 2,678 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,328 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (28,621 of 52,882 keywords). This Emissions Trading System is better (less manipulative) than 54.10% of the peer group.
Emissions Trading System
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠46%Emissions Trading System (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,328
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

46% percentile
025507510045.9% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Special Pleading: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.3%Composition/Division: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos