Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Eligibility Criteria results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Hasty Generalization , and Pessimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 375 hits . Analysis detected 1,014 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,572 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 59,653 keywords). This Eligibility Criteria is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Eligibility Criteria
Keyword details
Total words: 3,572
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst