Keyword summary
92%1 analyzed article/video805 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Election Interference Trump Midterms Save Act Voting results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28% saturation with 902 hits. Analysis detected 4,998 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,220 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 85% (7,899 of 51,009 keywords). This Election Interference Trump Midterms Save Act Voting is worse (more manipulative) than 84.50% of the peer group.
Election Interference Trump Midterms Save Act Voting
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Election Interference Trump Midterms Save Act Voting attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Election Interference Trump Midterms Save Act Voting vs sitewide
Election Interference Trump Midterms Save Act Voting attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.