Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Economic Sabotage results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Slippery Slope, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 364 hits. Analysis detected 2,390 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,192 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 59,653 keywords). This Economic Sabotage is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Economic Sabotage
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%Economic Sabotage (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,192
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.4%11.4%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Slippery Slope: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos