Keyword summary
78%1 analyzed article/video1,477 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Devin O’connor results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 1,011 hits. Analysis detected 6,587 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,908 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 65% (18,007 of 51,410 keywords). This Devin O’connor is worse (more manipulative) than 65.00% of the peer group.
Devin O’connor
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
65%Devin O’connor (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,908
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

65% percentile
025507510065.0% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 17.1%17.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 14.8%14.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.9%8.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 15.8%15.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos