Keyword summary
79% 1 analyzed article/video 869 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Denmark Study results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 799 hits . Analysis detected 4,775 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,476 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 77% (11,858 of 51,433 keywords). This Denmark Study is worse (more manipulative) than 76.90% of the peer group. Denmark Study
Keyword details
Total words: 3,476
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.9% percentile 3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 23.0% 23.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 14.6% 14.6% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 12.0% 12.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 23.0%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Burden of Proof: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 0.4% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.4% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst