Keyword summary
24%1 analyzed article/video1,442 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Deep Learning results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 466 hits. Analysis detected 2,505 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,768 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (22,885 of 27,787 keywords). This Deep Learning is better (less manipulative) than 82.40% of the peer group.
Deep Learning
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Deep Learning attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Deep Learning vs sitewide
Deep Learning attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.