BS Summary: These Debbie Wasserman Schultz results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 356 hits. Analysis detected 2,346 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,336 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 67% (7,796 of 23,285 keywords). This Debbie Wasserman Schultz is worse (more manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Debbie Wasserman Schultz attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Debbie Wasserman Schultz vs All Other Publications
Debbie Wasserman Schultz attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.