BS Summary: These Pedro Camacho results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 356 hits. Analysis detected 2,346 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,336 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (1,403 of 4,642 authors). This Pedro Camacho is worse (more manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group.
Pedro Camacho
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Sophia Gates0%
⁠0%SIMRAN PARWANI0%
⁠0%SILVIA STELLACCI0%
⁠1%Sergey Radchenko0%
⁠1%Robert Lloyd0%
⁠70%Pedro Camacho (selected)5%
⁠100%Kanoko Matsuyama54%
⁠100%Alex Horton56%
⁠100%Zahara Hill58%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt70%
⁠100%Bill Radke70%
Author details
Total words: 2,336
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Pedro Camacho attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Pedro Camacho vs All Other Publications
Pedro Camacho attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.