Keyword summary
99%1 analyzed article/video1,008 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Starkey results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 63.8% saturation with 1,930 hits. Analysis detected 5,134 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,024 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 78% (6,331 of 28,447 keywords). This David Starkey is worse (more manipulative) than 77.70% of the peer group.
David Starkey
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
David Starkey attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
David Starkey vs sitewide
David Starkey attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.