Author summary
99%1 analyzed article/video1,008 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Crace results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 63.8% saturation with 1,930 hits. Analysis detected 5,134 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,024 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 82% (982 of 5,246 authors). This John Crace is worse (more manipulative) than 81.30% of the peer group.
John Crace
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
John Crace attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
John Crace vs sitewide
John Crace attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.