Keyword summary
94%1 analyzed article/video988 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Crowley results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Hasty Generalization, and False Dilemma, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 426 hits. Analysis detected 3,620 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,964 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 63% (11,436 of 30,151 keywords). This David Crowley is worse (more manipulative) than 62.10% of the peer group.
David Crowley
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
David Crowley attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
David Crowley vs sitewide
David Crowley attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.